Audio Speeches on Wahhabism: Right click to download
We would like to express our thanks to the weekly show for these lectures. Stay tuned into their show weekly!!!
is the place to be
Audio Speeches on Wahhabism: Right click to download
We would like to express our thanks to the weekly show for these lectures. Stay tuned into their show weekly!!!
is the place to be
salaam alaikum brother
i truly believe that ibn taymiyyah repented as i have found some info on it myself.but what about his student ibn al qayyim?
Salamun ‘alaykum, i am not aware of anybody documenting his repentance, therefore if somebody was to call him an apostate, I would then keep my mouth shut and not say anything about what they have said.
The book will get a bad response from deviated people. Thats expected. However, its that few that swallow the truth with sincerity and do their best to cross over to the path of orthodoxy . This is who the book is for
salaam brother im just abit worried as your book may get bad responses from deviants peoples.
salaam alaikum brother abu muhammed my intention wasnt to cause an arguement it was to get the right info on ibn taymiyyah.
salaam brother im not taking a dig at you i promise you i respect you very much.i just know people who say that ibn taymiyya didnt repent i just dont know what the truth is.brother i am also sunni i follow the hanafi school im not a deobandi or a conncocted sect follower.im 100 percent cent sunni.
Those who indulge in disrespect of Prophet Mohammad (saws), Sahabah and Awliya Allah, their power of judgment is seized and they can never come back to the right path of Islam. They are destined to burn in Hell fire permanently. Zakir Naik is also one of these people who may die as Kafir.
We have not come across any thing so far which justifies that Ibn Taymiyyah repented. Even all Salafis, including major scholars of Saudi Arabia claim that he did not repent and died on his Salafi Aqeedah.
The repentance stories are spread by some crooked Salafis and Deobandis to fool innocent Ahle Sunnah wal Jama’a. Do not get mislead from such things. Concentrate on your Sahih Iman and your salvation in Hereafter.
Salam upon those who follow true guidance and follow not their nafs into the depths of kufr and innovation
Ibn Taymiyyah never once intentionally disrespected the Prophet sal Allahu alayhi wasallam. If we are talking about his belief in the alleged sins of the Prophets then this is an area where he was mistaken.
Al hamdu Lillah we do not worship a cruel god who allows no room to repent.
Ibn Taymiyyah has been reported to have repented and change his creed to Ash’ari and now I am forced to produce the evidence from Ibn Hajar al-Asqalaani who according to yourself is a crooked Salafi Deobandi, or was that a personal dig at me? Well it does not matter as only the evidence does. After my reply you can attempt to be all smug as you like. You can even continue to suggest Ibn Taymiyyah died a Kaafir, but thats purely at your own risk, because either he is a Kaafir or you are.
If this was betting, I would place my money on Ibn Taymiyyah to be the one forgiven by Allah, and so would scholars Ash’ari and Hanbali who all praised Ibn Taymiyyah as Shaykh ul-Islam despite his creedal and Fiqh flaws. Ibn Hajar al-Asqalaani praised Ibn Taymiyyah as Shaykh ul-Islam, so did Imaam Adh-Dhahabi, Ibn Rajab al-Hanbali, Ibn Kathir, Imaam as-Suyuti, the great Hanafi scholar al-Mulla ‘Ali Qaari, and a great number of Sunni scholars praised Ibn Taymiyyah and the MAJORITY of his works.
The Hanbali scholar Imaam Ibn Muflih even took his time to delete the Imaams mistakes and recompile the Masaa’il of Ibn Taymiyyah for his famous book which is relied upn in the Hanbali madh-hab as Kitaab al-Furu. To say none of Ibn Taymiyyah’s works are accepted nor relied upon is none other than the words of a fat liar worthy of whipping, and flying shoes. We do not depend upon the creed of Ibn Taymiyyah, nor the points where he vied against the Ahl us-Sunnah wal-Jamaa’ah, thats it.
Now to the reports of his repentance:
Here is the page in the biographical note of Ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani, in his book al-Durar al-Kamina, vol 1, p.158. He describes the repentance of Ibn Taymiyya, which happened in front of many scholars, saying that he was an Ash’ari, that the verse on Istawa was no tot be taken literally, and that the attribute of God al-Kalam was not with letters and sounds.
this repentance took place in 707H when Ibn Taymiyya died in 728. In-between, he was sent back to prison for opposing the Consensus of the Scholars again. But this testimony of Ibn Hajar does show that at some point in his life, Ibn Taymiyya did realise the seriousness of his sayings
Repentance of Ibn Taymiyah (705)
Ibn Taymiyah’s repentance written by his hand:
“Praise to Allah, my belief is that al-Qur’an is one Attribute of the Attributes of the eternal Self of Allah and is not created. It is not a letter and not a sound. It does not settle in any creation, or paper, or ink, or something else.
I believe in the saying of Allah: “الرحمن على العرش استوى” “Ar-Rahmanu `ala-l-`Arsh-i-stawaa” (Taha 5) explained according to the saying of the [Sunni] group attending this hearing. It is not understood according to its ‘haqiqah’ and apparent meaning. I don’t know its reality, only Allah knows the reality of that. The saying about an-Nuzul resembles the saying about al-Istiwa’. I say about the former what I say about the latter. I don’t know its reality, only Allah knows the reality of that. It is not understood according to its ‘haqiqah’ and apparent meaning, as the group attending this hearing said. Anything that contradicts this belief is false and anything I wrote or said which contradicts that is false. Any part of its content that accuses others with misguidance or attributes to Allah what is not befitting to Allah, I hereby clear myself of it and to Allah repent from what disagree with it.
Written by Ahmad bin Taymiyah on Thursday the six of Rabi` al-‘Akhir 705; Everything I wrote and documented in this paper, I said it willingly without compulsion. Written by Ahmad bin Taymiyah. Hasbuna Allah wa ni`ma al-Wakil .”
• On the top of that, the head judge Badr ad-Din bin Jama`ah wrote: “He testified in my presence; all that he wrote was by his own hand on the specified date.”
• At the footnote of the handwriting: “He testified all that which he wrote by his hand. Written by `Abdul Ghaniyy bin Muhammad al-Hanbaliyy.”
• Following the handwriting of Ibn Taymiyah, there are some testifications. Here is a copy of it: “The aforementioned wrote by his hand the above material in my presence and testified its content. Written by Ibn ar-Ruf`ah.”
• A copy of another handwriting: “He admitted that. Written by `Abdul `Aziz an-Nimrawiyy.”
• A copy of handwriting: “He admitted all of that on the date listed. `Aliyy bin Muhammad bin Khattab al-Bajiyy ash-Shafi`iyy.”
• Another copy of handwriting: “This occurred in my presence on the date listed. Written by al-Hasan bin Ahmad bin Muhammad al-Husayniyy.”
• In the footnote, it is written: “The aforementioned wrote by his hand and testified. Written by `Abdullah bin Jama`ah.”
• Another copy of handwriting: “He admitted that and wrote it in my presence, Muhammad bin `Uthman al-Burijibiyy”
All those individuals are from the great scholars during that era. Ibn ar-Ruf`ah alone authored al-Matlab al-`Aliy fi Sharh Wasit al-Ghazaliyy in 40 volumes.
After Ibn Taymiyah wrote the statements by his hand, the head judge al-Badr Ibn Jama`ah stamped his handwriting by the noble mark and a group of the scholars witnessed that. That document was kept in al-Malkiyyah an-Nasiriyyah library
[Najm al-Muhtadiyy documented this statement with the signatures of the scholars who signed it. Ibn Hajar conveyed the record in ad-Durar also but the date he documented was 15th Rabi` al-Awwal 707.
The warnings of salvation apply to you because like I said [and no its not my takfeer but your own takfeer] you are either a Kaafir or Ibn Taymiyyah is either a Kaafir. Your choice, your salvation – you deal with it.
Also a question, do you or not accept the Islam of Bint and Washi? or do you believe they are Kuffar?
Assalamu alaykum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh
Dear Brother
MashaAllah, you have done a much needed thing for the wider community. Living in a western country, it is becoming difficult for youngsters to differentiate the truth from falsehood. Everywhere they are being told that this or that is shirk or a bid’ah.
Recently my 15yo son went to Umrah with his classmates. On returning he had many “new” things to talk about. An accompanying teacher had made lectures, songs and soforth. My son became interested. I asked my son if he knew if the teacher followed the correct aqeedah and he said yes because the teacher told him so.
I told my son, you can believe everything everyone tells you. You must find out for yourself. I did a search on the name and it so happens that the teacher is a Wahabbi. More questions arose in my son’s mind. SubhnaAllah, your site is one that is easy for him to understand.
Too many people are brainwashed too easily these days, including my father. I pray to Allah, that more people like yourself and sister Amina, continue doing the excellent work that is very much required.
Jazakumullaahu khairan katsiraan.
First I will say that I am Christian, not Muslim, but I am deeply grateful for your exposure of this devilish cult. I believe that God has created all humanity to live in harmony, not to hate or judge one another. I hope the sincere believers, of all faiths, will unite to educate people against Wahhabism and other cults of hatred, God willing.
nice article…jazakAllah
also visit
salaam brother
there are still some people who thin that ibn taymiyyah died as a kafir.could you pleae remove my confusion.
jazakallah khair
Salamun ‘alaykum
Can you point out what needs to be deleted?
im not sure brother i just read on your message you said that ibn taymiyyah died as a sunni scholar but some people are of a different view.thats all i wanted to point out.
jazakallah khair.
mashallah brother abu muhammed is doing fantastic job in exposing these wahhabi mad dogs and their ugly beliefs.may allah reward you in abaundance.
I recommend that you use your time sincerely finding the truth rather then backing biting Scholars of the past.
May Allaah (swt) guide you to the truth & forgive your mistakes.
Salaam
I feel the sincerity in your comment, although I am upon 1400 years of confirmed proof, and remain unshaken in that fact.
I would like to share this with you.
We both agree that the best of generations is the first three due to the hadeeth of the Messenger of Allah sal Allahu alayhi wassalam where he informed us that the best generation is his, then the one after, then the one after.
We both agree that these are the Salaf, and they are the bedrock.
We both agree that our understanding of the Qur’an and the Sunnah should be the very same understanding that the Salaf held
We also know from the same hadeeth that untrustworthy people would appear in large number after the first three generations [although some appeared in their time].
We also know from another hadeeth that the knowledge would be passed down generation to generation by trustworthy people.
The Messenger of Allah sal Allahu alayhi wasallam told us that Allah would send a scholar every century to revive the Sunnah and refute the bid’ah.
Now this information is all important, for if you cannot produce a scholar from each century all in accordance with the views penned by Muhammad b. ‘abd ul-Wahhab, then the Salafi claim falls to the ground and you stand upon nothing.
However, this being the case, despair not. Allah is all forgiving, ever Merciful and there is a large community of believers ready to love you as you should be loved.
Please consider this deeply
wa as-Salaam
“It became clear to me what the purpose of this website originally was.”
I am not really bothered about the character assassination attempts on the mentioned Imaam, I am more concerned with the fact that 300 scholars from Makkah and Madinah signed of on the Fatawaa that the Deobandi elders who made such attacks are Kuffar. This concerns me more. The Imaam is just one person, however it is much harder to character assassinate the 300 scholars who agreed with his findings and declared takfeer on the Deobandi elders and furthermore said that whomsoever doubts their kufr after knowing the evidences is also a Kaafir. This should be the main point of concern. Also, every Saheeh Hanbali I know has accepted him. Shaykh Abu Ja’far al-Hanbali, Musa Furber and more. The Hanbali scholars of is age said nothing but good about the Imaam, the only people that said bad things were known Deobandis, therefore I do not have to study into dirt mcfly’s diary of slander.
What amuses me is the fact you have made the Imaam as the most pivotal subject to this site. Like I started this site “bismi Imaam Ridaa Khan” or something. Indeed you have laid your thoughts on the table. Even though your conclusions are somewhere out there with planet venus.
Assalamualaikum,
Alhamdulillah.
I am a student of Islam, and I happened to end up on your post while researching Hanbali Madhab, which seems most appealing to me. I was wondering what the ‘pro-sufi’ stance was all about because Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal is one of the most strictest in his literal interpretation of the Holy Qur’an and the Ahadith of Rasulallah (saws). That’s one of the reasons why I lean towards the Mazhab.
When I read your statement “likewise, the subcontinent people who follow the great reviver of Muslim Orthodoxy Imaam Ahmad Ridaa Khan al-Barelwi are respectively called Barelwis.”
It became clear to me what the purpose of this website originally was. Don’t take this the wrong way, but having studied some of al-Barelwi’s works, and seen stuff like his claim to be infallible, and claiming that certain verses of the Qur’an ‘actually’ don’t mean what they say. Forexample in the Barelvi translation of the Qur’an, “Najmus Saqib” is translated as the descent of Rasulallah (saws).
I hope you continue your quest for knowledge and unlike many others who got content at themselves and slept peacefully thinking “Paradise is now garaunteed to us on the paths that we have chosen and there can’t possibly be a truth other than what I believe”, you keep your horizons broad and keep growing as a Muslim.
I will leave you with a Du’a much frequented by the Noble Messenger (Peace and Blessings be upon him):
اَللّٰهُمَّ اَرِنَا الْحَقَّ حَقًا وَّارْزُقْنَا اتِّبَاعَه وَاَرِنَا الْبَاطِلَ بَاطِلًا وَّارْزُقْنَا اجْتِنَابَه
O Allah! Enable me to see the Truth as Truth and give me the ability to follow it. And enable me to see the falsehood as false and give me the ability to refrain from it. Amin.
Wassalam.
Regarding the retraction of statements that Ibn Taymiyya made infront of the Ash’ari council; I recall Abdur Rahman Mehdi stating this was a falsification, however, yourself and Shaykh Gibril Foaud Haddad have both made the statements – What is the source? forgive me if you’ve listed it brother Andrew.
JazakAllah ta’ala Khayr
I shall look through the relevant books of tareekh, and provide an answer when I stumble across the trials and death of Ibn Taymiyah. It may be in Tabaqat al-Hanaabilah, but then again I will have to check, as I may be mistaken
Saudi’s Destruction Of The Islamic Heritage:
This destruction is occuring due to the reverence directed towards these holy sites. The saudi clerics state that this respect leads to the ultimate sin – shirk. However one must question, what is the difference between fact and myth? ‘Evidence.’ The saudi’s are ridding our islamic heritage so the new generation of people are made unaware of the rich history of Islam in the the two holy cities.
kitaab ul-Jihaad Bukhari – I fear from the Najdis, i have to find this hadeeth
Assalam-u-Alaikum,
شيخ الإسلام جميل حليم يفضح إبن تيمية والوهابية
Shaykh al-Islam Jameel Halim exposes how Ibn Taymiyyah and his shaytaan-wahhabi followers declare all Muslims as kuffar including the Companions of the Prophet!!
Salaamun ‘Alaykum
Ibn Taymiyah is forgiven inshaAllah, he repented in front of a whole council of Ash’ariyah and too became an Ash’ari just before his death.
This is why the scholars that took him to task for his kufr statements prayed over him in his Janaazah. If he died an apostate, they would not have done this.
We can only hope that Allah forgives Imaam Ibn Taymiyah for eventualy embracing the truth of Sunni Islam, therefore Ibn Taymiyah is one of our scholars, yet with this said, we reject all his mistakes and only take from what is agreed upon from him.
Wa as-Salaam
Walaikum Assalam,
Jazak ALLAH Khair.. many people who are new to learning about Islam, and many reverts do not know that… including I think many wahhabis!
Insha’ALLAH you are in the best of health and imaan!
Wassalam
Assalam-u-Alaikum,
Jazak ALLAH Khair for the video and information.. again very informative & intersting! I am learning so much from you masha’ALLAH I think ALLAH guided me well when I found your site alhamdulillah!
Imam and Hafiz of hadith Abu Yala (Rh) narrates a hadith in his Musnad with the chain going back to the companion of prophet , Sayyedina Huzaifa (rd) that the prophet of Allah ( Rasul Allah Sallala hu alai hi wasallam) said:
Verily, I fear about a man from you who will read the Quran so much that his face will become enlightened and will come to personify Islam. This will continue until Allah wishes when these things will be taken away from him when he will disregard them by putting them all behind him and attack his neighbour with the sword accusing him of Shirk. The Prophet was asked ‘Which of the two was commiting Shirk? The attacker or the attacked?’ The prophet replied ‘The attacker (the one accusing the other of Shirk).”
The classification of this Hadith is Jayyid.( Strong)
Imam Ibn Kathir (Rh) also recorded this hadith in his Tafsir under Surah Al-Araf.
ya`malu ar-rajulu bis-sunnati fa yuqaalu bida`tun.” – “when a man follows the Sunnah, it will be said of him, ‘Innovation.’”
It means the people will be acting according to the Sunnah of the Prophet (saw) and the others will tell them “bida`tun.” That was foretold 1400 years ago!
Today if you do anything according to the Sunnah of the Prophet (s) they tell you “bida`, bida`.” Are we seeing this or not?
You cannot move anywhere except they tell you “bida`!”; they tell you “haraam!” they tell you “shirk!”, “kufr.” There is a group of people among the Muslims, who if they don’t like what you do, say “bida`, bida`.” before, when we were young we never heard it used like that. But the new generation all say that, they were raised in it. They are in that hadith now. Everything they are learning from those who said “bida`, bida`,” and they go on the street and tell everyone this is bida`, this is haraam. Shaykh Muhammad Hisham Kabbani
Jazak ALLAH Khair brother, I really do appreciate that.. but really I feel sooo strongly about these wahhabi devils that perhaps I can post too much sometimes, and I don’t want you to think I am trying to gain some lime light or anything! You see, I only reverted 3 years ago, and I didn’t know about wahhabi’s back then, the only Muslims I know are online because there are no Muslims of Mosques where I live, so of course the wahhabi’s got their claws into me.
They would constantly ‘correct’ me, they seemed so angry and full of hate always ‘debating’ (attacking) others, and it effected my imaan greatly, I started to feel that I had made a big mistake in making shahada.. astaghfirullah!! What they were ‘correcting’ was not the Islam that ALLAH had guided me to and what I had been learning previously, the Islam I know now fills me with love and that gives me strength like I never knew before. In the end I fell down and litterally cried to ALLAH to help me and guide me, I was so confused and had no one to turn to…
Subhaan’ALLAH, the very next day someone gave me a book, and in the book it taught me all about these wahhabi’s and other deviant sects … so I looked deep into it.. and the more I learned about them, the more I realised that is was not where ALLAH guided me to! Then they began to attack me and send me threats via email. What a bad lot they are!
I tell you this because there are MANY reverts out there who are in the same position! The Wahhabi’s always try to get their poisenous hooks into reverts or those looking into Islam, and the treat dawah like Christians are with missionary work, because they do not know the correct meaning of dawah..
it is not about getting as many people as possible to ‘convert’ .. dawah is about helping people to understand the beauty and depth of our religion, which is important these days because of the Zionist media which lies.. it is ALLAH who guides, and all the fancy banter and polished sugar dipped words in the world can not make a person a MUSLIM.. being a Muslim is a privelage and an honour and should NEVER be taken for granted! ALLAH knows best!
Jazak ALLAH Khair again brother
Wassalam
Salamun ‘alaykum sister
Are you the same sister that was once Wahhabi, but after seen Faisal Ibn Saif Allah Sheikh and Hamza Patterson defeated in a debate by a Barelwi? I think you post is above, or if it is another sister.
Where the Islamic Centre in Nottingham held a speech on tawheed, Faisal turned up with a bunch of his Wahhabi goons, with books etc and attemptede to debate a scholar who did not have any books on him, and they was publically defeated again!
The first time they were defeated in a debate was with Abu Ja’far al-Hanbali. This started when when Hamza Patterson was arguing with people at Nottingham University, because, as he claimed, masterbation is halaal.
He publicly got defeated on thatg issue in front of a handful of witnesses which then lead to a discussion that was held in Aspley, where the Wahhabis Faisal and Hamza turned up with intention of debating Abu Ja’far al-Hanbali.
The debate was recorded on mp3, and as witnessesed, Abu Ja’afr al-Hanbali ripped them to pieces so much that they denied that they followed Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab and that they were no longer Salafis! However, they soon changed their tunes when they left the debate, after being heavily defeated.
Everybody in Nottingham knows these people are fakeheads.
Walaikum Assalam brother,
No I am not that sister.. but subhaan’ALLAH I have heard about and read about such incidents soo many times here in England. The sheer arrogance of these wahhabi’s never ceases to astound me!
I do hope I am not rambling, but what I add here is for reverts like myself, in the hope that they may learn something from it. Wahhabi’s tell everyone they are Sunni Muslims and this can be very confusing to reverts. As a revert what you see and assume to be are very knowledgeable and studious Muslims who speak such grand words, and because you are new, it all appears very impressive, and you want to be as knowledgeable. I assumed them to be such good pious Muslims and wanted to be just like them, because I wanted to be a good pious Muslimah.
As time went by, I saw how they attacked, riddiculed, humiliated and belittled others, which included other Muslims, always shouting ‘Shirk! Biddah! Kuffir!’ and telling Christians that they would burn in the hell fire! I saw many Christians who had previously respected Muslims start to hate and turn into Islamaphobes.. in other words they were deliberatly burning bridges and causing people to hate us! Then starting big and grand ‘dawah’ campaigns?!
My advice to any individual who wishes to learn about Islam and to reverts who are still learning, is to firstly study the Hadiths as well as the Qur’an. You see, growing up as a Christian I already loved Jesus pbuh, this had been instilled into me from an early age. However, although I knew that Islam was the truth, I didn’t know our beloved Prophet pbuh, so I had to learn about him, and only by learning about him through the Hadiths can you begin to love him, and that love grows and grows as does the huge respect of his ways and the compassion, patience and love amongst many other wonderful qualities he had, and THAT is the example we follow.. this was something wahhabi’s NEVER taught me, or even directed me to learn! So the more I learned about our dear beloved Prophet Mohhamad pbuh the more I understood what the Sunnah is and what it means to us as Muslims! I began to see the wahhabi’s for what they are! Fitna freaks who brag and boast with grand words, yet have no feeling and no compassion. They do not love our beloved Prophet pbuh, nor do they understand him because if they did, they would follow the Sunnah rather just quote it!
Hadhrat Abbas radhiyallahu anhu narrates that Rasulallah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wassallam) has said, “Islam will spread far and wide, across the seas. Horses will cross the land and seas in the cause of Jihaad. Then a time will come wherein a group of people will emerge which recites the Qur’aan. They will claim,
‘We have recited the Qur’aan and is there anyone who understands the Qur’aan better than us? There is NO ONE more proficient than us in the study of the Qur’aan.’
Then Rasulullah sallallahu alayhi wasallam asked the Sahaba, “Do you see any good in their claims?” The Sahaba replied, “No”. Rasulullah sallallahu alayhi wasallam said, “But these conceited claimants will be from my Ummah and will be the fuel of the Fire.”
Salamun ‘Alaykum
SubhanAllah, spoken with true experience. The hadeeth you quoted! I have read that hadeeth but never took it into consideration as such. SubhanAllah, I wish to find that hadeeth and study into it inshaAllah.
That is two ahadeeth that you have contributed. The first oen that proves the Khawaarij are kuffar, and even though some scholars have differed, even the Kharijite Saleh al-Fawzaan admits that the majority opinion of the earliest scholars is that the Khawaarij are complete kuffar. See the following video:
I would download that one and use it against the Wahhabi that says “Go and complete your fith pillar then, go and pray behind the Khawaarij if you think them to be kuffar”
Regards and wa as-Salaam
As salamu ‘alaykum,
Anyway we can hear that debate!?????
what debate ?
Walaikum Assalam,
I am looking forward to your book very much.
What I post here is merely me sounding off as I despise wahhabi’s, it has my name to what I post (which is a screen name & not my real name) and that does not reflect on you, however if you don’t like what I post, then you can tell me or delete it, I will not be offended as this is your web site and I respect it for the factual information and respect you for what you are doing in exposing the wahhabi cult devils in an intelligent and knowledgeable manner.
wassalam
Salaamun ‘Alaykum
I apologize if I miss alot of your posts, your posts are never moderated in my recent comments as they are automatically approved. In otherwords you have earned the privalege of posting what you like without admin approval. That is why your messages do not show up as messages that I would normally reply to. For that I apologize as they have been overlooked until I have noticed when scrolling through the page. On average I deny or accept from 5-15 messages a day. I have a lot of Wahhabis attempting to waste my time. So you can imagine how much my admin recent comment box is full of trash messages which also put a strain of answering everybodys message on time. As for your messages, you have a green card from me.
Regards and wa as-Salaam
Assalam-u-Alaikum,
We all know the Saud’s are wahhabi’s and part of the illuminati. Only wahhabi’s trust their educational books with the Saud stamp of approval on them… they helped to destroy the Khilafah and build monsterous buildings towering over the Kaaba (which contain illuminati (satanic) symbols) despite the fact that no building should be higher than the Kaaba! The list goes on and on which holds as absolute proof of their constant hypocricy!
Would YOU trust the likes of these to ‘educate’ you about Islam?
Salamun ‘Alaykum
I personally promise you the book will be timeless and benificial. People who would love to be mentioned in it will not find their piggyback to fame therein.
The book contains historical, geographical and theological facts. I have excluded illogical, philosopical, cheapshots.
This book is tightly knitted so much so that should a Wahhabi sincerely studyfor the sake of finding the truth instead of assuming hes already on it and then arguing from there, he would cease to be a Wahhabi.
The videos are spot on as these Kaafir Wahhabis talk about helping Palestine all over facebook day and night, but support the very Kaafir Sa’udis that agreed for the British to give Palestine to the Jews as long as they got Sa’udi [refer to the peacot agreement] They calim to care about Palestine, Albani made it clear in his fatawaa calling Palestine dar ul-kufr and claiming that it now belongs to the Jews… is what the Prophet sal allahu alayhi wasallam said about al-Quds? no…
These videos demonstrate clearly that the Wahhabis are in bed with George bush, just as Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab was in bed with the British. The kuffar are friends of each other. Even Bill Gates has put the Wahhabis to shame with their 600 billion dollar charity… whereas Sa’udis are the richest people on earth and watch Muslims suffer world wide. I am even considering scrapping my open letter to 10 downing street as Wahhabis are their pet dogs, and you know how these kuffar love their najis pets.
This definatly belongs to you Hamza Patterson theres no mistaken that. People who know him, challenege you this. Get him to change his avatar there and then, and then look here> consider I cannot be here every second of the day to change it to make it look like him !
Wallahi these are his words and Wallahi thats his profile!
Content of the above video
The Salafi Cult – Better Known as the Khawaarij
Hadith:
Ibn Umar (Allah be pleased with him) reported the Prophet (Peace be upon him) as saying: “Oh Allah, bless us in our Syria; O Allah, bless us in our Yemen.” Those present said: “And in our Najd, O Messenger of Allah!” But he said, “O Allah, bless us in our Syria; O Allah, bless us in our Yemen.” Those present said, “And in our Najd, O Messenger of Allah!” Ibn Umar said that he thought that he said on the third occasion: “Earthquakes and fitnah are there, and there shall arise the horn of ash-Shaytaan.” [Sahih al-Bukhari].
When Abu Umama saw the heads of the rebels hoisted on poles in Damascus he wept and said: “The dogs of the people of the Fire.” Then he was asked: “Is this from you or from the Messenger of Allah”? He said: “From the Messenger of Allah, and I have heard him say it not once (but more), nor twice (but more), nor three times (but more)” until he reached seven times. Then he was asked about his weeping and he said: “Out of compassion for them. They used to be Muslim and they became kafir.” Narrated by Tirmidhi (hasan), Ibn Majah, and Ahmad through several chains. [Sahih At-Tirmithi, Ibn Majah, Ahmad bin Hanbal]
This one contains a hadeeth I did not know, JazakAllah, its being included in the book !
The embed didn’t work :O( .. here is the link
Post edited by admin
Reason. Just another argumentative fool with nothing but rude insulting behaviour. Let this be a lesson for anybody who wishes to waste their time typing emotional abuse!
In Answer to Ahmad [the lying Salafi] “Hanafi”
I have edited your post because i can and will, and of course, to make idiots such as yourself think twice before posting such pathetic rubbish.
I am not scared to voice that the 300 schoars of Makkah and Madinah are correct in their fatawa that the deobandis and their defenders are absolute kuffar. Imaam Raza simply provided the evidence of the kuffriyah statements fro them to base that fatawaa upon. The Fatwaa makes it it clear that anybody who considers one who made such kuffriyah statement to be a Muslim believer is also a Kaafir. Since I have no scholarly authority to disagree with them, I stay within my league.
But nooo mr Ahmad the lying Salafi has to be better than these scholars and say …no Raza Khan is the kaafir and then claim that the Ashariyah and the Marturidis are in consensus about this!! What a claim! Set up your own blog and prove it! Ohhh you mean the Deobandi “Asharis and Marturidis”? I think I just heard the toilet flush with your argument with it.
Shaykh al-Yaqubi [who has the shortest senate with only 45 in the isnaad from the Prophet sal Allahu alayhi wasallam to himself] has praised Imam Raza Khan as a reviver of this deen. What do you now have to say about that? I do not hear the majority of Asharis and Marturidis screaming that he is wrong in his claim! People like you do not realize the gravity of your own words..nor do you care which scholarly authority you disagree with.
Plus you claim to be Athaari, how? How can you be Athaari? Theres only two scholars on this whole planet that have legitimate authority to teach the athaari creed, and they bot opine that Imaam Ahmad Ridaa Khan al Barelwi is a great scholar and a reviver of this deen!
Look up under Abu Ja’far al-Hanbalis scholars section on and go to and ask Shaykh Musa Furber.
Your argument is stupid and baseless, full of hatred towards Pakistanis. Please go and hate elsewhere as such rubbish does not merit anymore of my time.
Argument-heads – take this as a warning because I will delete and edit your posts, then steam roll over you.
As-Salaamu ‘Alaykum . Did you create the above video?
Walaikum Assalam,
No I didn’t create it.. the brother who stays anonymous has set up a whole channel exposing wahhabis. If you would like to contact him I can ask him to email you?
Hanbalis affirm the sifat of Uluw as in transcendance, highness with the creed in mind that Allah is over our imagination. Over all, Over the Heavens, etc without saying how, simply because such knowledge of Allah cannot be understood by the human interlect.
This video prooves that Wahhabis are not Hanbalis as they wave around their hands and point to their body parts when discussing Allah’s glorious Attributes!
It is not wrong to say Allah has a Face or Hands as He has desribed in the Qur’an as Hanbalis affirm these Attributes upon their Zaahir without saying how nor giving them literal or metaphorical meanings. But the way these fools are saying Hands, Face and waving their hands around in explaining is pure Tashbeeh! and then they have the audacity to criticize the people of ta’weel?
Hypocrites
You can tell this guy came from the the street thug scene, grew a beard and an Islamic persona, but the thug is still there
Asalaam aleykum whoever wrote this message i believe you took it out of content, as i said the brother meant first thing should be followed is Quran and the sunnah of prophet muhammad (s.a.w) if prophet himself one day he told his companions not to use anything over the quran and therefore to stick with quran and understand it. Off course quran can not only be understood by its self, there are three ways of understanding first verses have direct meaning, the second one prophet gave the meaning and the third one are for scholars of knowledge. Now where he said we should not be relied on this four imams, I don’t personal think that is what he meant and plus many of his lectures are encouraging mashaallah, I wish you posted the whole episode. Unfortunately today we are choosing side and rather seeking for truth you should be ashamed for this go and read Sheikh Ul-Islam Muhammad Abdul Wahhabi’s books and come back and comments. Your no way near his knowledge or his manners toward Islam and you dare write these disrespectful comment. Make some towbah akhi or ukhty otherwise these will cost you for nothing we got a bigger fish to fry than this meaning more important things than this one.
Wa alaykum as-Salam
Qur’an and the Sunnah is something that all modern cults claim, but only one of them can claim Qur’an and the sunnah and the understanding of the first three generations, as passed down through each century through the mujaddideen, i.e. the revivors, and that is the Ahl us-Sunnah wal-Jamaa’ah. Who are they? See my article the Touchstone under the ‘Aqeedah section.
To be a Shaykh ul-Islam you have to be qualified in the 18 sciences of Islam. There is no proof that Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab was ever qualified in a thing, there is no proof he even memorize the Qur’an, even your own scholars ADMIT he was self read from the works of Ibn Taymiyyah. Reading a book does not make you Shaykh ul-Islam. Read my article The Factual Biography of Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab under the Wahhabis section for more clarification.
As for disrespectful comments, insults etc, clearly there is a stark contrast between the style in which we write. I find you writings to be full of disrespectful comments, insults, etc, and I understand why. You cannot really refute anything I said, so instead you attack the author, sugest hes lying etc. It called adhominem, character assasination, but guess what. I could be the biggest liar and Wahhabism would still be a false cult, and Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab a false Prophet, a false scholar. Disproving me does not disprove the issues at hand.
Asalaam aleykum brother Abu Muhammad Ibraheem al-Hanbali, I do not know yet your deal but whatever its may be, may Allah(S.W) guide you. I do not need to argue with you, indeed you know better than I but Allah(s.w) is the best of all. I am studying his books now days Sheikh Muhammad Abdulwahhabi (Rahimatullah), the book called Kitabu At-tawheed, subhanaALLAH the whole entire book is full of verses of Al-quran and ahadith organized accordingly and you dare to accuse him. What have we become now days Subhannallah am not going to add anything more..
Wa alaykum as-Salaam
Yes, I can see you new to this, and have much to learn. But instead of trying to look how to refute me, and what the deal is with me, maybe you should read through the site and at least get a grasp on what has already been documented. Maybe I can save you a lot of time and save you from many years of baatil bashing.
Inshaallah the link of this book. the translation version, please tell me something wrong in this book and i’ll stop studying this book immediately!
ok, fair enough
• Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab claimed to know the issue of tawheed better than the majority of the Sahaabah. Chapter 1, Kitaab ut-Tawheed
• Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab claims that the Ash’ariyah have denied the Attributes of Allah but gives no explanation to what Attributes, how they have denied them, etc. he just makes a claim and offers no explanation to back his claim. See chapter 2, point no. 12 Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab, in chapter 2, point 12 of his Kitaab ut-Tawheed. His grandson does not even care to explain in Fath ul-Majeed, p. 49. Again in chapter 16, point no. 20 Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab repeats the same accusation but does not explain. Such a matter of tawheed merits an explanation.
• Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab blindly follows Ibn Taymiyah and Ibn Qayyum in their dividing tawheed into two. Fath ul-Majeed, English translation p.8, the Prophet nor the Sahaabah nor anybody from the first three generations ever categorized tawheed in this fashion. Indeed the first three generations was on the complete teaching of tawheed, whereas the innovators have introduced matters into tawheed and then used their innovated theology as a springboard to takfeer and kill innocent Muslims, past and present
• In Chapter 23, Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab argues that Muslims worship idols. By using An-Nisaa ayah 51, however who was this ayah revealed about? Also the ayah in al-Maa’idah ayah 60, again who was this revealed about? Point no. 7 of this same chapter claims that Muslims will practice idol worship.
• According to Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab and the understanding he passed down to his grand-sons, those who do tawassul via the Prophets and the Righteous are in a depth of kufr much worser than the depth of kufr than that of the pagans of Makkah. p. 37 – 38, Fath ul-Majeed. This understanding is seen further in chapter 18 where Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab argues that Abu Jahl knew and understood the kalimah better than Muslims who understand the principles and essentials of Islam, see Fath ul-Majeed, p. 206. Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab demonstrates his understanding further in point no. 5 when he claims that that “The disbelievers are more guided than the faithful believers” see Fath ul-Majeed p. 240
• By misinterpreting the hadeeth “the supplication [du’a] is worship” to mean “all and every du’a is worship” Wahhabis promote the idea that whosoever “calls upon other than Allah” are complete mushrikeen and disbelievers. Therefore those who call upon the Messenger by saying “Yaa RasulAllah” or the righteous by saying “Ya ‘Abdul Qaadir” are complete disbelievers according to the Wahhabi creed. See Fath ul-Najeed p. 67, p. 86, p. 93; Kitaab ut-Tawheed, Chapter 14: point no. 10 and 11. In fact, the whole of chapter fourteen is dedicated to those who call upon Prophets and saints, labeling such people who “call upon them” as kuffar and mushrikeen.
• Chapter 14 also argues that whosoever calls upon Prophets or the righteous should “Declare his repentance or otherwise be killed”, this is also the understanding found within Fath ul-Majeed, p. 180
• It can be seen in chapter 6 of Kitaab ut-Tawheed, and the context of the chapter and the “evidences” that Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab has used the permissibility to kill Muslims who display great respect for their Elder Shaykhs and teachers, or whoever admitted to following one of the four madh-habs by labeling themselves Hanafi, Maliki, Shaafi after their respective Imaam. Both of these acts Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab deemed as shirk and from that premise declared lawful the spilling of blood of any Muslim and even the taking of their property. According to the Wahhabi creed, anybody who does not accept the hadeeth of the “Salafis” as the “stronger evidence” and continues to follow another hadeeth in favour of it, or depending on the knowledge of the scholar that transmitted and utilized this hadeeth within the madh-hab, then the Imaam and his madh-hab has committed shirk. See Pgs 369-372 Fath ul-majeed The suggestion that Muslims worship the four Imaams can be further seen on pgs. 373 to 374 of Fath ul-Majeed
• Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab contradicts the guidance of Islam which tells us that a Muslims blood is inviolable except for three cases. A. the murder of another, b. adultery, c. apostasy. Wahabi creed teachers “Merely pronouncing the statement “there is no god but Allah” cannot make ones property or blood invioliable” This is the understanding of Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab and his grandsons. See Fath ul-Majeed p. 102
• In great excitement at spilling the blood of Muslims who the Wahhabis deem as mushriks, Abdur Rahmaan burst out with joy “What a great issue! What a clear statement! What a decisive reason! He then further demonstrates this understanding by quoting the ayah of Allah “Kill the mushrikeen wherever you find them” see Fath ul-Majeed, P. 103. Only the Khawaarij would use a passage of the Qur’an in this fashion!
• ‘Abdur Rahmaan also makes the folly of comparing the Muslim believers who “call upon other than Allah to the apostates who denied the Zakah. We see this when he said: Abu Bakr as-Siddiq and the honorable companions of the Prophet Muhammad waged war against those people who refrained from paying the due Zakah, they must be fought as they would be regarded as renegades and apostates.” See Fath ul-Majeed pgs 104-105 The Wahhabi creed claims that the Muslims who “call upon others besides Allah” are more worthy of killing than those who denied the Zakah [Kashf ush-Shubuhaat]
• A person is allowed to by “taken by force” and even put to death should he reject the Wahhabi call, it is a case of embrace Wahhabism or die. p. 73 Fath ul-Majeed
• Wahhabis can murder anybody they deem to be a disbeliever or a hypocrite for ‘Abdur Rahmaan states “It is permissible to kill the one who shows himself to be a disbeliever or a hypocrite” See Fath ul-Majeed, p 384 chapter 39. This means Wahhabis can kill anybody they like without any ameer of governmental body. All they have to do is set up the accusation, and without any court of law, no display of mercy, a person is put to death. History shows us that not only this has happened, but will also continue to happen anytime a Wahhabi decides to have their way.
• Chapter 63 Muhammad ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab uses the passages from An-Nahl to suggest that Muslims have broke their covenant with Allāh and according to Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab it is permissible to fight and kill them “as they disbelieve in Allāh” see point no. 4 in chapter 63 p. 505 of Fath ul-Majeed
• Chapter 15 argues that the Prophet is incapable of helping from beyond the grave. The Khawaarij misuse ayah 23 from Surah as-Saba [22] to argue that Allah has denied the Prophet the ability to hear. Usul ut-Tafseer shows us this ayah was revealed about the Kuffar. How can anybody use an ayah that was revealed about the kuffar and then apply it to the best of creation? Only the Khawaarij are known for such ayah misinterpretation! This is their corrupt understanding, as Wahhabi creed teaches “Because they are dead and are unaware”. See Fath ul-Majeed, p. 177, Abdur Rahmaan follows his grandfather in the corrupt opinion that the dead cannot hear when he said:“This is true regarding the living man, who can do and observe things. However, dead people cannot sense those who invoke them and also cannot bring any benefit or harm…” p. 405 chapter 42. Secondly, Tareekh [Islamic history] has shown us again and again how the Prophet has heard and came to help those who have asked for his help, even though he is in the baarzakh.
• Chapter 19 argues the false analogy of worshipping the Prophet as the Christians did with Jesus, see Fath ul-Majeed, p. 215; in Chapter 66 Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab suggests that it is shirk to call upon the Prophet with the title master, and they also argue that milaad un nabi is shirk pgs. 518-519
• Chapter 22 argues that you cannot face the grave whilst doing any form of du’a, and that you cannot make intention to visit the Prophet, but to only visit the three holy masaajid. See Fath ul-Majeed, p. 237
• loud dhickr is considered as heresy pg. 45
• Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab implies that the Prophet and the Sahaabah taught shirk by teaching people to perform ruqyah and ta’weez, see chapter 3, Kitaab ut-Tawheed, point no. 5. And chapter 7, point no. 2. And point no. 7. This is one of the many reasons why “Kitaab ut-Tawheed” should really be called “Kitaab ush-Shirk”. Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab’s grandson also implies that whosoever uses ta’weez is a complete mushrik. See Fath ul-Majeed, p. 53
• In Chapter 44 Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab implies that a Jew corrected the Prophet in his knowledge of tawheed by brandishing a hadeeth in which a Jew came to the Prophet and accused him of doing shirk. Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab, instead of refuting this Jew he takes the position of this Jew against the Prophet by brandishing the happening and making his desired points from it Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab wrote concerning this point “The Jews knew what shirk ul-asgahr is” Thus by implying that the Jews were correct in saying that the Prophet sal Allahu alayhi wasallam was upon shirk . The shirk the Prophet was accused of was swearing by the Ka’bah. Abdur Rahmaan further confirms this when he says: “This proves that swearing by the Ka’bah is shirk, and the Prophet did not reject the statement of the Jew who said to him ‘verily you commit shirk”see Fath ul-Majeed pgs 409-412
• In Chapter 50 p. 435 onwards Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab levels the accusation of shirk against Adam by using a fabricated hadeeth.
• Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab denies 800 years of authentic scholarship see Fath ul-Majeed, p. 357 however his very own grandsons correct his notion on p. 359 and correct the import of the given hadeeth
• Chapter 67 Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab certainly promoted the anthropomorphic creed, point no. five he suggests that Allah has two hands, left and right. See Fath ul-Majeed p. 523. Other Wahhabi publications argue that Allah has two right hands.
Asalaam Aleykum, Inshaallah I’ll do reply for this when I have corrected every points and mistakes or accusation you have made base on the book “Kitab Tawheed” inshaallah, before i continue any further you have your own view base on these books. I do not know yet about other books becouse i haven’t read them yet. Base on this book and calling it a book of shirk!! I think that is wrong and a very hash way of thinking. Islam has its own way of living and rules, does not base on philosophy and logic’s, Saidnah Ali (R.A) said once upon a time “If a religion could be our personal view then I would suggest to wash our feet underneeth rather washing them on sideways to the ankles ” sorry isn’t the exact word he spoke but the meaning was you can not add something to religion just because you think is wright! I found some of the points like you mentioned on ch.23 on point no: 7 which wasn’t there unless you are speaking of different book brother? I know what you believe in, in this point of view your aqeedah and mine are not sharing the same concept of Al-Islam. Arguing isn’t the solution but understanding is, I am sure you have many people of knowledge who lives under the same aqeedah and I respect that, lets all Muslims unite at this times of difficult and learn our shortcoming instead of pointing fingers on one another.
Wa alykum as-Salam
The thing is with arrogance is the ability to correct whilst being ignorant of the issue at hand. I could be telling you the facts, but no, as you insist, even if I am right in all my conclusions, you are out to correct them! This is the most common case and problem with Salafi preaching. They are always out to correct what is actually right, “correcting” with whats absoletly wrong.
It is like cleaning the windows with dog poo insisting it is clean. Please stop right there with all false claims please. If you want to be superman and refute me, then dude, the spinning doors or a phone booth should not be too far away.
As for different Kitaab ut-Tawheeds, brother thats your problem with your cult leaders, not mine. You see I am quoting not just from Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab’s primary text Kitaab ut-Tawheed, but its very primary understanding Fath ul-Majeed, and my copy speaks of Some People of this Ummah who will worship idols. Howver, it is quizical to me why you have singled out this chapter?
Again, I cannot unite and hold hands with somebody agreeing with their false aqeedah. If I did so I would face Allah’s judgement and punishment.
You are my Muslim brother, but get this, as long as you are defending the Wahhabiyyah, then we cannot hold hands sining come by Yah everything is fine and dandy. It just would not be right.
so let me get this straight? You delete posts who seem to refute you or you disagree with? Hmmm some “scholarly” honesty. I REALLY trust your article now.
Rather you got it bent from the beginning, therefore I do not allow no Baatil and falseness on this blog just as Salafi blogs delete and edit my answers. I have stated before, if you want to “refute” and such and such, then set up yourown blog.
Just do not come with “ainus wipe” theology on my blog. Too much arguments from the Sulufaa [with a swaad].
and plus you claim theres falsehood in the article, well read over the footnotes, as I have quoted from Wahhabi trash again and again.
The fact is Salafis believe in a false idol, that is not Allah! Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab is a false Prophet and his following is a false cult. There is nothing more to say.
plus answer this, do the raghead Saudi dogs allow books on Sufism to be sold in the hijaaz? Or do they arrest and imprison people who are found with books of “deviance”?
Ok this is a stupid article and has numeroussssssss false claims. Please educate yourself. It’s actually laughable.
Well have a nice laugh, but i must warn you you will be crying on Qiyaamah when you know for fact you supported a mass murdering cult.
And as for the education, I read the books and the biography written by Jamal Bozo [you have him reccomended on your site].
I have read “numeroussssssss” Wahhabi trash books that promote nothing but bad opinion about Allah, His Mesengers and the generality of Muslims [which totally contradicts the hadeeth about sincerity], takfeer based upon misintepretation of the Qur’an. Bottomline dry throat theology that in all despairs the Mercy of Allah and promotes a deeds based salvation.
You can laugh, but I am concerned for your salvation. All I ask is that you read my forthcoming book. I can even arrange a free copy sent to you. Then you can decide for yourself and make an informed decision. The education is upon you. Please do not be like a Jehovahs witness who hide behind their doctrine and refuse to read any other.
Assalam-u-alaikum .. I have shared your blog on Facebook. There are too many confused Muslims because these wobblers are stting Mosques up all over the world claiming they are Sunni, so there are many Muslims who actually think they are Sunni but are wahhabi.. it is important we all know exactly what we are following and do not stray from the TRUE Islamic teachings!
Here is a very good channel on Youtube.. everyone should check it out.. the brother is nor phased by the wahhabi fitna freaks either who send insults and threats.
Jazak ALLAH KHair!
assalaamu 3alaykum brother this has been a very eye-opening report jazakullah khayr for sharing this information… you’ll be in my du3a! Allah bless you in your struggle to bring the spotlight back on tradition islamic science!!
Wa ‘Alaykum as-Salaam
I have neglected the book the Wahhabi Threat for two weeks, thanks for the reminder how much this book is needed. The struggle continues.
Wa as-Salaam
Asalaamu Alaikum Wa Rahmatullah, Masha’Allah!
My name is Abdullah Ali al-Amim al-Sicili. I am a member of the Nur uz Zamaan jamaat and a student of The Nur uz Zamaan Institute (Masha’Allah you have used a few of our lectures I noticed from blogtalk). I am very happy and proud to see authentic followers of Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal defending the creed of Ahluls Sunnah wal Jammah.
It reminds me of when Salahuddin Ayyubi, who was an Ashari, and Ibn Qudamah al Maqdisi, who was an Athari, fighting along side of each other against the Crusaders masha’Allah! I have used some of your information here in a very short article on my blog and made sure to give you credit, I hope that is ok. Let me know if you are ever interested in maybe doing a project together it would be an honor.
Wa alaykum as-Salaam wa Rahmatullah
I am honored to have your lectures on this site al hamdu Lillah, such lectures boost the strength of the Muslims in times of despair in which Sunni youth are becoming unsure of their creed, and seemingly do not have the knowledge or evidences to back up their creed, however it is lectures like yours that put us back on our feet and give us the sword and shield and the strength to battle on. You have permission to use what you want without giving me credit as I have only utilized the truth carried by other great soldiers of the Sunnah, more deserving of the credit. After the release of the forthcoming Wahhabi Threat I would love to work on a project together, inshaAllah.
Wa as-Salaam
Salamun ‘Alaykum, I tried to find your blog but could not find it.
Wa Alaikum Asalaam, I am looking forward to your new project akhi. As for my blog it is:
And as for the jamaat of Nur uz Zamaan, we have a knowledge base site which is at:
Assalam-u-Alaikum my dear brother… Jazak ALLAH Khair for this excellent blog exposing the wahhabi dogs! More,. more, more please!
Asalaam alkm, I hope you are in an increasing state of emaan and good health inshaallah. I have been reading your posts here sister and all i see is pure hatred, don’t accept blind following and don’t waste your time on the internet. I know this could be very useful to you, but then could also destroy you “wa aooudhbillah” am not asking that to be the case but am warning you! UK is not the only place to reside in this earth Allah(s.w) has told us all this earth belongs to him and therefore we can make hijra/move to the place where religion is not compromised. Please don’t encourage this brother and do what is right! this debate your engaged isn’t your fit and therefore Islam isn’t compromising religion, its peaceful religion. I pray to Allah(s.w) to guide and protect you wherever you are sister to the last day inshaallah. Baraqallah feek
I will let the sister answer for herself
Walaikum assalam… What a huge pity that you think ‘truth’ is hate. I do not stand on street corners shouting ‘kuffar’ at passers by, I do not shout abuse at other human beings, nor do I swing my tonsils in full view of the media cameras shouting ‘jihad’.. I do not burn poppies or flags, I do not believe Bin Laden is a martyr and I do not smash up sacred shrines.. or for that matter agree with building public toilets over them as they have done in Saudi… that brings me to another point.. I believe in ONE KING, I bow my head ONLY to ALLAH!
Shall we get started on the rich saudi wahhabis who takes 2nd wives and toss them and their children (except sons) onto the street to beg? Or the ritual abuse of women and children in Saudi, or the poor Pakinstani children who are bought and then abused…
I suggest you refer to the Hadiths… I am quite sure I have posted MANY.. what an enormous ‘pity’ you only read hate into the words I have typed and seen hate in the videos I have posted… there is massive lesson to be learned in this… and from this site. Perhaps I should pray that you wake up before its too late!
Have a nice day :O)
Amazing answer, and the very purpose of this site, which is to continue documenting the Wahhabi Threat and Amina very well did so. Takbeer!
May peace and blessing be upon you all, may be you miss understood me, but my point wasn’t about the whole crashing about what wahabi’s does or shia or any other group. If today a brother named Muhammad commit a shirk or a kufr then that person is no longer a Muslim until he makes Tawbah to Allah (S.W). I don’t want to debate to any of you, if you think this is helping Muslim’s well and good. I personally liked the videos you posted on this blog, but will that teach any one who doesn’t have the knowledge of Al-Islam. If you give a book to somebody that has a Controversial issues and a book that has the teaching of the basic of Al-Islam, which one of these books will one benefit the most. And we all know how technology got far today, they can put images where isn’t belong to so is the video, audio and extra. Prophet Muhammad(S.A.W) said “They will come people towards the end of time, the false massiah and great liars, they will come with a speech neither you nor your parents have ever had of them before, be aware of them(stay away from them) and they will bring fitnah (Temptation)” We need to study and to do more research on these issues before we attack. These Four Khalifah or other previous Imams for Fiqh they took time to give some Fatawa before they came to conclusion. Now how on earth would us come to this point on giving ahkam very soon without having pannels of sheikh giving their opinions and finally Fatwah. Inshaallah go and read the way of these Imams and see for yourself and i do apologies if I offended you sister. Jazakallah Khairan
there are many fallacies you are operating under. I will let you read the site, because from what I have gathered, you have only just started taking this deen seriously and I do not want to spoil your zeal with information overload.
[content rightfully edited by admin]
Sorry pal, had to delete all your posts, simply because you was speaking a bag of rubbish and argumentum that nobody is interested in. Especially in Ramadan. If you want to be the solider of Shaytaan, then I advice to try somewhere else.
Why are you Sufis stooges for the kuffar?!
Why do kuffar kill Sufis? Whom I mean by the Kuffar is the Wahhabi dogs, doing the same to the Sufis of Somalia as the Wahhabi dogs did to the Sufis of ‘Arabia!
You have to face the facts brother Abu Umar, the fact that the Prophet sal Allahu alayhi wasallam never said that the victorious group would be from Najd, or Sa’udi, but rather Shaam. Who are the scholars of Shaam and what minhaj are they upon? It is not the “Salafi” madh-hab!
Consider your salvation closely as this is no joke
Asalaam Aleykum, brother I am no scholar and have very little knowledge regarding Islam. But what is really happening here is wrong! you want to do something that pleases Allah (S.W), then help the poor by giving out some charity, do something productive in Islam help the needy. What you are doing now is tearing apart the brothers and sister who are just embracing Islam and the one who are seeking true knowledge and the worst of all bringing a big confusion. Are you telling me all the sects are wrong and yours is correct!!! so call me to Islam and not to fancy which group. One of the companions asked prophet Muhammad (S.A.W) that ” give me only one advise that will satisfy me ” and prophet told him to say “I believe in Allah(S.W) and stay in the Straight Path”. Now is this the Straight path you are taking brother, are you ready to stand before us in the day of Judgment and defend what you are up to? we need to work together and not to develop unnecessary argument every time you hear about your fellow Muslim brothers.If somebody made a mistake or got it all wrong what is the point of starting an argument in the first place, if you know you are in the right path then go along with that road, try to ask him and reason with him like prophet Muhammad (S.A.W) did with other great companions like Saidinah Abubacar (R.A) and Omar (R.A) and the rest companions, why trying to be smart or hero over something isn’t worth it at all. I read many of your comments and think you are not bringing this nation together but rather your own interest brother. I hope you do understand what I am talking about, I don’t really care if u’ll remove this comment or not but I ask Allah (S.W) to guide us both to the day of judgement, asalaam aleykum.
Wa aalaykum as-Salaam
What pleases Allah is wiping the baatil out of the community, keeping the Muslim Ummah informed about what is Sunnah and what is bid’ah, refuting the cults, and warning the people against Wahhabism, along with other charaties to the poor, etc, I do exactly this. Your implications are in complete ignorance.
Wahhabism is tearing apart the unity of Islam. They have a murderous creed, and Allah and His Messenger have warned us not to unite with the cults. I know the rope of Allah, I know the who the Salaf are and the promised revivors of the Khalaf, and its not some false Prophet who appeared in the 11th century AH with a bunch of new claims against the Muslims accusing the scholars of being misguided for 400 years predating him. Yes, I speak of Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab.
I do not think you have a enough grounding to even criticize my efforts. Your reasoning is very poor. Maybe some private advice from myself could serve you better, but thats up to you.
Salam, I just want to say that I admire what you are doing and this is one of the most resourceful blogs on the Hanbali school. Especially being sound and not another Wahhabi propaganda blog. I have read the other blog the *&^%$ report and can clearly see the difference between those who benefit people, and the Shayaateen who specialize in trying to destroy peoples reputations. The #$%^#% report is stupid and senseless and bears no fruits. Typical Wahhabi dryness, re-ducted and reproduced from the hard line deserts of Nejd. You get no less from these internet muftis and cyber-nejdis. Allah will make your book successful inshaallah ta’aala. I am reserving my copy now! waalaikumsalam
Salaamun ‘Alaykum
Thank-you for the support. I edited your post slightly as I do not want the famehead report to get to swell.
Well this comes as no surprise, it just goes to show what kind of maniacs I am now up against. Even to the extent of threatening my family. Sorry Hamza but your done, action will be taken should you show your ugly face anywhere. Do not think I am scared of defending myself.
As regards to the night raids, thats laughable, you and your whole caravan of Wahhabi dogs could not find me the last time you tried. Reason is, you simply do not know where I live. All you know is I have moved, and nobody knows my address, not even who you think I know, and others, so I would not waste your time and effort phoning the whole community in attempt to find me.
The thing is you Khawaarij have a lot to lose, especially Faisal’s brother with his England cricket career. He cannot afford to get caught with you and the gang in the back of his car with weapons ready to attack me like the last time.
The books going to be released, and theres no “piggyback to fame” for you. You and Faisal can delight in your fake emails from me, I rightfully deny them all, plus the fake posts on your fakehead report where you have edited my words.
As long as my name is mentioned on your fakehead report, I am getting thawaab for all your backbiting and slander, so what does it matter to me.
Do what you want, just make sure you buy my book as there will be no free pdf handout this time. Thanks for finally sticking your head out and showing your true colors. Nice one.
[just to note abumuwahhid has denied he wrote the above message from ip address 212.183.140.39 and email . Funnily enough, click his name and it leads to his website]
1. This fakehead has claimed I have refused to debate him, I have declined simply because this fraud is not in my league and as a Sunni I do not do debates.
2. This fakehead is from Nottingham and does all of his speeches in a fake american accent
3. The so called refutation to me is a load of cut and paste of what he could find on google. No wonder they call him an internet scholar! This point alone exposes his sincerity for research. He is not for truth, but will look for any given falsehood to refute from google, claim its his and then be satisfied with that! I have no room, no time to debate google scholars!
How am I to express my feelings when you take off my posts?
Theres no platform for baatil and emotional feelings, therefore some posts are not even approved. If somebody has something to say against what is written, then build your own blog.
You tried to suggest that I have not read the books of Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab, I possess most of his works in ‘Arabic, even those that have not yet been translated. I have read them and see them for what they are. In the article, I have included footnotes, it is your job to go back to the books and check.
Furthermore the post makes it clear that Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab never verbally claimed Prophet hood, however he did establish his own authority that lays claim to have abrogated the deen that the final Messenger of Allah sal Allahu alayhi wasallam preached.
This can be seen by the points that were set by different scholars contemporary to Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab. These scholars were from different locations, some of them having never met each other, moreover they were first hand witnesses to the remergnece of the Khawaarij from the Najd province.
Even though Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab did not explicitly claim Prophethood, he certainly claimed the authority to abrogate the following hadeeth of the Prophet [which only a Prophet can do] from
Saheeh al-Bukhaari, vol. 1 hadeeth no. 104 also in Saheeh al-Bukhari vol. 1 hadeeth no. 114 where the Prophet sal Allahu alayhi wasallam said in no uncertain terms:
“Beware! (Mecca is a sanctuary.) Verily! Fighting in Mecca was not permitted for anyone before me nor will it be permitted for anyone after me. It (war) in it was made legal for me for few hours or so on that day. No doubt it is at this moment a sanctuary… also in vol. 3, hadeeth no. 58; hadeeth no. 60; vol. 4, hadeeth no. 412; vol. 5, hadeeth no 603; and volume 9, hadeeth number. 19. Thus there is no ambiguity to the authenticity and strength of this hadeeth, having numerous chains of isnaad.
Again, this is not a forum to express your feelings. If you choose to do so then there a numerous hotlines and self help groups that are wiling to listen. Like for example which offers a Salafi outreach and further support for those who are bewildered and need support leaving the Khawaarij movement.
May Allah give you success upon the truth of Islam.
Regards br. Abu Muhammad Ibraheem
JazakAllah khayr
Jazak Allah Bro !!
Salam u Alekum!!
To All bro’s ,, I liv in Pakistan And here these wahabis call themselve Ahle Hadeeth… Like We says Ahle Sunna wal Jamath. .